Thoughts, Trading

Price Action Trumps Divergences

I was reading the RSI page on and came across some interesting conclusions.

I quote: “Positive and negative reversals put price action of the underlying security first and the indicator second, which is the way it should be. Bearish and bullish divergences place the indicator first and price action second.”

That explains why one should not take trades based purely on a divergence between price, and an indicator  based on price. When you take a trade based on a bullish / bearish divergence, you are saying that the indicator leads the price action. Now the question is, is that assertion strong enough to stand on its own? is that ‘phenomena’ consistent?

In my own experience, taking trades based solely on a divergence is a hit-and-miss matter. It sometimes works, sometimes fails, and does not seem to contain any edge.

The article notes that In a strong uptrend, bearish divergences are normal. Similarly bullish divergences are normal in a strong downtrend. Hence one should not be too eager to see them as entry signals on their own.

Where I find divergences more of value is when the divergence is between price and a market breadth indicator, such as the cumulative new highs – new lows value. Those divergences I think are more useful as they highlight differences between the outward strength of the market versus the strength beneath the surface.



No comments yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Copyright © 2005-2014 All Rights Reserved.

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Blog Stats

  • 398,657 hits
%d bloggers like this: